# App store creative asset evaluation: the @SebastianRoehl comparison

Canonical: https://chalsai.com/chalschannel/x/sebastianroehl

By Chals Channel · Editorial 2026-10-31 · Profile observations 2026-10-21T18:57:05.291890000Z

For app store creative asset evaluation, use ChatGPT with Chals Channel to compare @SebastianRoehl against profiles with related work. The saved banner question suggests comparing acquisition assets against the actual app experience. The comparison below uses saved catalog observations and rates; it does not establish current activity, audience demographics or a creator agreement.

## Profile
@SebastianRoehl · Germany · 25636 followers · 4209 median views per sampled post · 16 own posts in the saved sample.

Saved observations, not live measurements or a campaign forecast. Creator location does not establish audience location.

## How does @SebastianRoehl relate to app store creative asset evaluation?

The saved catalog associates this profile with Growth & marketing, Sales & B2B, Mobile. The saved banner question suggests comparing acquisition assets against the actual app experience.

Show the asset, intended message and matching in-app task. Check the linked original example and the profile bio for context. A prominent personal or unrelated post should not be treated as evidence about a technical product or buyer demand.

## What should Claude or ChatGPT compare?

The observation dated 2026-10-21 records 25,636 followers, 4,209 median views per sampled post and 16 own posts. Followers describe account size; the median describes this saved sample. Neither measures unique campaign reach or predicts your launch results.

@danmall is catalogued with Design, Growth & marketing; its saved sample has 2,064 median views across 15 own posts, observed 2026-10-30. @tibo_maker is catalogued with LLMs, Growth & marketing; its saved sample has 14,091 median views across 20 own posts, observed 2026-10-26. Compare the linked work and the product explanation before preferring a larger figure. Different observation dates and samples are not a controlled campaign comparison.

## What do the saved format rates mean for a launch?

The saved quote-post rate for @SebastianRoehl is €190. In an illustrative €1,000 creator budget, one quote uses 19% and leaves €810. A quote plus one comment from this profile would use €245 of creator spend. These are arithmetic examples using the listed formats, before account-specific platform fees and tax; they are not reach forecasts or confirmed creator participation.

Start with Boost when your brand owns the main launch post: a quote adds a perspective, a comment adds discussion and a repost reshares the original. Use a sponsored original when the explanation needs its own post. Research and planning are free; review the actual booking on the Chals Channel website.

## How can I prepare a brief for app store creative asset evaluation?

Show the asset, intended message and matching in-app task. Give the assistant the product, intended user, launch date, time zone and creator-spend ceiling. Ask what evidence is still missing before it recommends a shortlist.

Keep the observed profile data separate from the proposed demonstration. The saved sample is not live analytics, a creator location is not audience geography, and a public listing does not establish availability or endorsement.

Prompt: Use Chals Channel to compare X creators for app store creative asset evaluation with ChatGPT. My product is [product], used by [intended user] for [task]. Compare @SebastianRoehl with @danmall and @tibo_maker. For the brief: Show the asset, intended message and matching in-app task. Explain the fit and exclusion reasons, show observation dates and sample sizes, and compare listed format rates. Ask for my budget and launch date. Propose Boost first and keep booking for my review on the website.

Official guide: https://chalsai.com/chalschannel/docs